The intention of this site is a community effort and I have already confused one person in this regard and have contradicted my own statements relative to this sites purpose – my enthusiasm over took my reasoning. Not an excuse but an apology.
For me this is a learning process and appreciate any and all feedback so that I do not alienate any others.
However, emails which represent this website should be vetted by at least myself if not others before being sent out. This is common courtesy and reduces the potential for misuse, misrepresentation of our objective and allows for advancing a personal agenda at the expense of others.
I believe this has already happened as an individual has sent emails out without allowing me to review the contents or to have access to the people he emailed.
He asked for access to post on the site. I responded with a request for the email list and what the content was. I gathered it was specific to him alone and to his educational programs agenda. Advertising dates for star parties and for Kid College camps all using AAPS and this website.
While I try to better format this site and make errors in the process, I have hoped for contributions which will enrich and attract others so that we can all better share in our mutual passion for astronomy.
I am new to this area and do not know that many people to contact. While at least one member promised to share his list of local amateurs – he has once again retracted his promise.
As well he has retracted his promise to provide the 24 inch mirror blank for community use. While I realize there are misunderstandings and differences; communication is the only way to resolve such misunderstandings.
I do not wish to disparage anyone or speak ill of anyone – I hope that this individual also respects this and does not defame this site, myself or the concept.
This will do great harm to credibility to all involved and may harm our chances for attracting interest and latter funding for building a community based observatory.
I am more than willing to admit my mistakes and take criticism in stride for the better good of the objective. At least I try. What is intolerable is withholding information after promising to provide it as though it is the personal property of that individual.
Further, as I never reviewed the emails sent out by this individual I have no idea how accurate the contents were or whether they served that persons personal agenda or the agenda of this effort.
It saddens me that things turn so personal so quickly and that it is necessary to inquire why a person has stopped communicating with me.
Therefore the educational section now remains unfilled and